аЯрЁБс>ўџ ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ§џџџўџџџўџџџ ўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РF mt‘ж0зSummaryInformation(џџџџиDocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџ$WordDocumentџџџџџџџџ&ўџџџўџџџўџџџ  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01234567ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ р…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0ЈH€PXh x „А;‡‡;‡‡@>Ёе0з@€)S‘ж0зWPS ‡eW[ўџ еЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎŒH(€0 8@А ˜(\€dlKSOProductBuildVerА2052-11.1.0.9998&0Tableџџџџ n Data џџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџWpsCustomDataџџџџџџџџџџџџ џџџџџџџџџџџџьЅС‰ˆ PП†KSKSУ&ч [џџџџџџЄ_ s 82 S.V l  $Гh2>Ћ Ћ?  §VЖ[0Wt::N†Nг~_gй:WAmLˆХu bьNХ_{˜јvсOбyf[(10) Snow's realization came years before the confirmation of germ theory, which explains the existence of pathogens. He didn't understand how cholera was transmitted in the water, simply that patterns of disease indicated it was. Learning about the step-by-step progression of historical discoveries will, Andrews hopes, put in context the fits and starts of contemporary scientists' attempts to understand COVID-19. (WЏeњ‹аcњQК‹Йp„vpet^T џу‰Ъ‘ХuŸSSOX[(W„vЬƒŸSК‹Mb—_0RС‹ž[0Џeњ‹v^ NnZi —qN/f‚YUO(W4l-N O­d„v џъS/fОuХu„v!j_>f:y‚Ydk0‰[З_œЏeќvg џf[`N†SђSбSАs„vekлU\ џяSхNЉ‹КN\S_уNбyf[Ж[\勆Nу‰COVID-19іeліe„vЧ z џ>e0Rй{|бSАs„v м~-Neg w0 Maybe our unfiltered view will turn out to be a good thing. After all, the best way to build trust in science is by showing all of its hypothesis testing and hypothesis tweaking maddening to watch while we're anxiously awaiting answers to a global plague, but in the end the only way toward results that will allow us to move on with our lives. bИ‹bьN§€єvЅc w0Rй*NЧ z0R4Yeg/fNіN}Y‹N0еkпz џ‰њ^Ыzљ[бyf[„vсOћN џg}Y„vЙe_/fU\:yƒ[@b g„vGPО‹Рhš[ŒTGPО‹Œte--(WbьN&q%`I{…_sQŽNй:WhQtvЋu„vT{Hhіe џйNR w@w€{єvфNКNбSТr џFOgШ~tS/f/UN„v„_ џ€_§€Љ‹u;mоVR_ck8^„vг~œg0 Surveys show the general public is less dismayed by watching scientists in action than I had feared. Since 2015, the Pew Research Center has tracked what Americans think about science, and it has steadily become more positive, including in a poll conducted in April and May 2020 as the coronavirus was cresting and many of those surveyed were under lockdown. Œхg>f:y џN,‚'YO(W w@wбyf[Ж[LˆЈRіe џv^ N‚Yb@bХbУ_„vЃHNЎl'N0ъ2015t^w џЎv$\xvz-NУ_1\cэ~§*ŽŽ§VКNљ[бyf[„v wеl џг~œg>f:y gŠegŠckb—„v‹ПR џvQ-NSьbЪNt^405gZP„vNy˜laŒхg џS_іeCOVID-19ЋuХ`ckО0Rиš№\ џИ‹YзSП‹€§рV\ЮW €…_(WЖ[Ь‘0 In January 2019, the last survey before the pandemic, respondents were already inclined to trust scientists, with 86 percent saying they had a "great deal" or a "fair amount" of confidence that scientists had the public interest at heart. That level of trust inched up to 87 percent amid the pandemic. 2019t^1g џ(WhQt'YAmLˆ_ЫYMR„vgTN!kŒхg-N џзSП‹€ђ]>PTсOћNбyf[Ж[ џ86%„vКNє‹жNьN ^—8^ b ASR јvсOбyf[Ж[ŠblQqQ)RЪv>e(WУ_ N0'YAmLˆgє• џй*NсOћN zІ^Ў_E^ NGSѓ87%0 But when I called Cary Funk, the director of science and society research at Pew, to talk about these encouraging results, she told me not to get ahead of myself, that the story is a bit more complicated. According to Funk, the surveys show a deep partisan divide in how much scientists are trusted. Republicans and Republican-leaning independents still seem reluctant to embrace science wholeheartedly. They are about half as likely as Democrats to express a "great deal" of trust in scientists a proportion that has stayed stubbornly low at 27 percent. FOS_bSb5uн‹й~Ўv$\„vбyf[N>yOxvzш;NћNяQ=NЗЏQKQ џŒŒй›NфNКNŸ‚„vŒхgг~œgіe џyYJTЩ‹b+RиštQ—_*Yщe џ‹NХ`‰єf YBgN›N09hncЏQKQ„vє‹еl џŒхg>f:y N TZQ>mљ[бyf[Ж[сOћN„v zІ^ gˆ_'Y„vRgk0qQŒTZQe_ё‚э‹f[`Ns^№Sџwww.TingClass.net  PAGE 1 f[ё‚э‹ џУ~,T›R џ N,T›Rў‹X00MQ9ё‚э‹,T›R N}0www.tingclass.net 68p r t „ † Œ Ž    Ђ fhjz|vxzŠŒlnp€‚”–˜ЈЊ,.јњќ vxzŠŒЬЮ§ћљїѕѓёяэыщчхуспнлйзегбЯЭЫЩЧХУСПНЛЙЗЕГБЏ­ЋЉЇЅЃЁŸ—‡o(nHtHUPJo(nHtH o(nHtHo(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(o(4$&(*,~„†їячпйгЫЩo(PJo(nHtH o(nHtH o(nHtHo(nHtHU0Jo(nHtHUo(nHtH0Jo(nHtH8r Ž hxn–њxЮ,€‚„†§ћљїѕѓёяэыщфтЋЅЃЁŸ„h]„h7ЄYD$dNЦџ%dOЦџ&dPЦџ'dQЦџ(dRЦџ&`„јџ„#$a$$ 066666666Рар№ 0@P`p€Рар№6666 0@P`p€Рар№ 0@P`p€Рар№ 0@P`p€Рар№ 0@P`p€Рар№ 0@P`p€Рар№ 0@P`p€Z@ёџZck‡e a$$1$0CJOJPJQJ^JaJKHmH sH nHtH_H$A@ђџЁ$иžЄ‹Еk=„W[SONi@ѓџГNnfhˆ