Up next, the case of engineers versus law enforcement. Last December, there was a terrorist attack at a holiday party in San Bernardino, California. Fourteen people were murdered and the two attackers were later killed in a shootout with police.
下一条新闻,技术问题VS执法机关。去年十二月,加州圣贝纳迪诺的一个节日派对上发生恐怖袭击事件。14人被杀,之后,在与警察的枪战中,两名袭击分子被杀。
The Federal Bureau of Investigation confiscated the iPhone of one of the shooters, but I can`t hack the phone to see what`s on it without the terrorist`s passcode. If investigators guess incorrectly ten times, the phone will automatically erase all of its information.
联邦调查局取得了其中一名恐怖分子的手机,但是因为没有密码,而不能破解手机获取其中的内容。根据iPhone设定,一旦连续10次输入错误密码,手机全部资料即会自动销毁。
Tech company Apple makes the iPhone. It does not have the terrorist`s passcode. But the FBI wants Apple to create a special version of its software to load unto the phone, get around its security features and allow law enforcement agents to hack it.
科技公司苹果研发了iPhone。但它并不能获取恐怖分子的手机密码。联邦调查局希望苹果公司研发一种特殊的软件加载到此手机上,绕过安全程序,而允许执法人员破解手机密码。
On Tuesday, a federal judge ordered Apple to help the FBI break into the phone. But Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to fight that decision, saying creating a way around the device`s security would be too dangerous, that it`s impossible to compromise the security of that one iPhone without compromising the security of all iPhones. He said the order was an overreach by the U.S. Government.
周二,一名联邦法官下令苹果公司帮助联邦调查局解锁该手机。但是苹果首席执行官提姆·库克反对该决定,称研发软件绕过手机的安全功能太危险了,仅绕过该手机的安全程序而不会对其他苹果手机产生影响是不可能的。库克还说,该项命令是越权的。
But law enforcement officials say they need all the evidence they can get from the terrorists.
但是执法人员称他们要尽可能从恐怖分子身上获得所有的证据。
I think the terrorist threats and criminal threats threaten their customers much more, being quite frank with you, and this is the crux of the issue. We need to get this issue resolved -- the profit motive under the guise of protecting the interest of their customers over the interests of government to protect the lives of those customers.
我认为恐怖分子和犯罪分子对人类的威胁更大,更坦率的讲,这才是问题的本质。我们需要解决的问题是,不遵循政府命令以保护消费者生命,而是以保护消费者的利益为幌子谋求利润。
Up next, the case of engineers versus law enforcement. Last December, there was a terrorist attack at a holiday party in San Bernardino, California. Fourteen people were murdered and the two attackers were later killed in a shootout with police.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation confiscated the iPhone of one of the shooters, but I can`t hack the phone to see what`s on it without the terrorist`s passcode. If investigators guess incorrectly ten times, the phone will automatically erase all of its information.
Tech company Apple makes the iPhone. It does not have the terrorist`s passcode. But the FBI wants Apple to create a special version of its software to load unto the phone, get around its security features and allow law enforcement agents to hack it.
On Tuesday, a federal judge ordered Apple to help the FBI break into the phone. But Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to fight that decision, saying creating a way around the device`s security would be too dangerous, that it`s impossible to compromise the security of that one iPhone without compromising the security of all iPhones. He said the order was an overreach by the U.S. government.
But law enforcement officials say they need all the evidence they can get from the terrorists.
I think the terrorist threats and criminal threats threaten their customers much more, being quite frank with you, and this is the crux of the issue. We need to get this issue resolved -- the profit motive under the guise of protecting the interest of their customers over the interests of government to protect the lives of those customers.